|
|
|
TSA member lines have announced an emergency revenue program for the first half of 2010, in an effort to obtain critically needed revenue prior to the usual service contracting season that begins for most carriers and their customers in May 2010. Effective January 15, 2010, the lines have adopted a voluntary guideline Emergency Revenue Charge, in the amount of: - US$320 per 20-foot container (TEU) - US$400 per standard 40-foot container (FEU) - US$450 per high-cube FEU; and - US$505 per 45-foot container The ERC is an interim charge that is distinct from the previously announced general rate increase (GRI) decribed below. The ERC is intended to expire upon execution of new contracts in 2010. TSA lines will engage with customers in various ways depending on how their contracts are structured, applying the ERC where contract terms allow, and seeking to negotiate reopening of contracts that do not provide for interim adjustments. The TSA guideline recommends that early bids or new contracts with early start dates prior to May 1 be quoted with the full, previously announced GRI.
The 2010-11 Revenue Improvement/Cost Recovery Program Specific elements of the TSA revenue program, to take effect with renewal of current contracts – most of those over May and June 2010 – include: - A general rate increase (GRI) of US$800 per 40-foot container (FEU) for local West Coast and Group 4 Western coastal states cargo, and US$1,000 per FEU for intermodal and U.S. East and Gulf Coast all-water cargo, with per formula increases for other equipment sizes. - A US$400 peak season surcharge (PSS), effective from August 1, 2010, to address higher cargo handling, equipment positioning and contingency planning costs during periods of peak cargo volume. - Full collection of fuel and other accessorial charges. While the scheduled increases are significant, when viewed in the context of volume and rate declines seen in early 2009, they will at best return base freight rate levels to where they were in late 2008. Rates at that time were barely compensatory, if at all, for most carriers in the trade, let alone profitable. Container lines have increasinglty consolidated capacity and services in vessel-sharing alliances and reconfigured routes and schedules. Many have delayed or canceled new vessel orders, returned chartered ships early and, where necessary, laid up ships in ports worldwide. Independent analysts at AXS-Alphaliner estimate that the top 17 global container lines lost a cumulative $6 billion in the first half of 2009 alone, with many forced to seek fresh capital in financial markets or in some cases government aid in order to stay afloat. Drewry Shipping Consultants estimates carriers will lose at least $20 billion for the full year in 2009, due to reduced demand and severely depressed rates. At the same time, the basic Asia-US market characteristics are unchanged - a two-to-one cargo and equipment imbalance; continued fuel price volatility now on an upward swing; rising shoreside infrastructure and environmental costs; and sustained rail pricing power in the intermodal segment. Slow demand, tariff and contract rates that hit near-record lows in early 2009, and rising costs have together constrained carrier cash flows. In turn, lines have been forced to respond with internal cost-cutting in areas such as customer service, documentation or equipment management. TSA lines voiced cautious optimism about the hopes for an improving Asia-U.S. freight market in 2010-11, but stressed that it will remain a year of significant uncertainty, in which carriers must concentrate their efforts on conserving cash, building a stronger balance sheet, and establishing a sustainable rate environment.
How Rate and Contract Guidelines are Developed Lines next take into account the anticipated relationship between available vessel/equipment supply and cargo demand for the coming year whether space and equipment availability will be tight or not, especially during peak shipping periods. More than 90% of total Asia-U.S. container traffic moves under such service contracts, although a small number of contracts may have different start dates and longer or shorter durations. Cargo that does not move under contract is covered under the publicly posted tariffs of the individual shipping lines. Most contracts involve a specified volume commitment in exchange for favorable service terms and price. Most contract negotiations begin in February and March, after carriers and their customers have had an opportunity to reassess market prospects following the traditional December-February slack season. A brief peak period appears in March and April, with back-to-school merchandise that will be sold during the summer. The primary peak season runs approximately from July through October, when holiday inventory is shipped, with carriers beginning to ramp up service levels during June. |
||||
|
||||